I was pleased to be a guest on a bright autumn day
at the recent EMEA Conference in Amberg. The conference presentations were
stimulating, and the conversations lively. MENC president June Hinckley’s
address helped us put into perspective the educational initiatives and
professional opportunities that influence our work as music educators now
and in years to come. I learned a bit about the triumphs and tribulations
of teaching music in DoDDS in an era of declining resources, rapid change,
and uncertain futures. I appreciated the balance in the day’s schedule
between large-group presentations and informal opportunities to share ideas,
issues, and concerns about our work.
“Time is a fundamental dimension through which teachers’ work is constructed and interpreted by themselves, their colleagues and those who administer and supervise them. Time for the teacher is not just an objective, oppressive constraint but also a subjectively defined horizon of possibility and limitation. Teachers can make time and take time, just as much as they are likely to see time schedules and time com-mitments as fixed and immutable.” (p.95).Time as a horizon of possibility and limitation seems to be a particularly apt metaphor for our work. Music teachers manage the objective time of clock and calendar in order to maximize the lived time of moment and experience. Within the limited raw material of minutes, we hope for moments of insight, communication, aesthetic response, the development of skill, the coming together of the ensemble. As I reflected on Hargreaves’ work, I thought of four themes that you might consider within your own horizons of possibility and limitation. First, think about the importance of giving ourselves permission to linger over unexpected events in the classroom that show a depth of musical understanding, or a students’ fresh insight. I find that it takes conscious effort to ignore the unrelenting march of the clock in order to savor the moment. A second thought relates to our stewardship of time, and consideration of the trivial matters that we can eliminate. What non-musical aspects of the daily routine can be dispatched in a quick and unobtrusive way? Our decisions about content are fundamentally related to time, especially considering the principle that “less is more.” Selection of musical literature is a good example. Can we maximize the time students spend with engaging, dynamic musical works by choosing fewer pieces and studying them more fully? Finally, I thought about the ways we “make time and take time” for personal and professional renewal and regeneration. The ever-elusive balance between our lives at school and our lives outside of school is an ongoing dilemma for many of us in music education. Time to follow our intellectual and musical curiosities, visit with our colleagues, enjoy our families, find quiet and solitudethese are essential to our well being. The distribution and uses and meanings of time are many, as Hargreaves reminds us. Proposals for restructuring schools, he argues, will fail unless they address the culture of teaching and the dimensions of time that are part of that culture. In my view, this work underscores the importance of giving time to teachers for their wise, discretionary use in making the educational experience rich for our students and satisfying for us as teachers. References
|